70th Anniversary of the Liberation of Auschwitz by the Red Army

Russia Excluded from Commemoration Ceremonies

Prisoners at the Nazis’ Auschwitz concentration camp are liberated by the Red Army,
January 27, 1945.

The attempts to rewrite history are mind-boggling.This week, the great lengths to which Germany went to make sure representatives from Russia would not attend the celebrations of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz were revealed.

A recent report by germanforeignpolicy.com informs that “EU countries are preventing the Russian president from participating at the commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.” The highest representative of the country whose army halted the mass murder in the German extermination camp January 27, 1945, is thereby excluded from the commemoration ceremonies, germanforeignpolicy.com wrote.  However, Germany’s President Joachim Gauck participated. This is the same Joachim Gauck who used his speech on the 75th anniversary of Germany’s invasion of Poland to stir up sentiment against Moscow and to transform the commemoration of Nazi crimes into an appeal for closing ranks against Russia. In his memoirs, Gauck described Red Army soldiers, who had liberated Germany, as beings “with Asian facial features,” “reeking of Vodka,” who “requisitioned and stole.” This is typical CIA propaganda about the conduct of the Red Army when it liberated Europe. Of course, for  the Red Army to achieve the feats it accomplished, discipline was decisive and it conducted itself very differently to what the slanders claim. The motivation of such slanders is understood from the statements made by Gauck a few years ago when he complained, “The occurrence of the German Judeocide has been inflated to a uniqueness,” because “certain milieux of post-religious societies” were seeking to induce “a certain shudder in face of the unspeakable.” In 2010, he was quoted saying, he “wonders how much longer we Germans want to nurture our culture of chagrin.”

The denial of the role of the Soviet Union in the anti-fascist war is for purposes of equating communism with fascism and thereby depriving the world’s people of communist leadership today. It is also to isolate Russia today, in the frenzied attempt by the U.S. to impose its control over Europe and dominate Asia, and of the European Union to do the same. Blaming the Soviets for all the crimes the Hitlerites committed also serves to cover up the crimes committed during the war by British Zionism’s projects and Zionist forces, the aim of which is to condone the terrible crimes the Zionist state of Israel is committing against the Palestinians, in the name of creating a safe haven for Jews, despite the fact they themselves only wanted a chosen few. All of it serves to deprive the younger generations of an understanding of the past so as to help them cope with the present in a manner that opens a path for the future.

But what it tells us is that today the reactionary forces suffer from a most morbid preoccupation with defeat. In their desperation they are reaching out to the Hitlerites of yesterday and today to save them. They are despicable indeed.

In a January 16 article, germanforeignpolicy.com writes:

“Just Like Nazi Troops”

The commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of the German Auschwitz extermination camp had been the focus of political intrigues already last year. At the commemoration of the 60th anniversary of its liberation, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s participation was still taken for granted. After having suffered severe losses, the Soviet Army reached Auschwitz January 27, 1945, putting an end to the ghastly murders Germans were committing. First attempts to exclude Putin from the commemoration of the 70th Anniversary were made in Poland in the summer 2014. A parliamentarian was quoted saying that the Red Army “had been an aggressor” in WW II, “just like Nazi troops,” which is why the Russian President should only be allowed to make a “penitential pilgrimage” to Poland.[1] At the time, [Polish President] Bronislaw Komorowski could see nothing wrong with Putin’s participation at the Auschwitz commemoration. However, anti-Russian forces have prevailed and the Russian President’s invitation was cancelled through diplomatic channels. According to reports, Poland’s Prime Minister Ewa Kopacz has also campaigned to prevent Putin from participating at a parallel commemoration ceremony in Prague. This would exclude the president of the country, whose army had lost more than a million soldiers just to liberate the German Reich and the Polish territories under German occupation.

Turned Against Russia

The anti-Russian use of the memory of German crimes against humanity is making headway with Putin’s virtual disinvitation. Already on September 1, 2014, German President Joachim Gauck used his memorial address in Gdansk — commemorating the 75th Anniversary of the German invasion of Poland — to stir up anti-Russian sentiments. Referring to the Ukraine conflict, Gauck accused Russia of giving a higher priority to “a quest for power,” rather than to “maintaining stability and peace.” Completely blotting out western support for the Ukrainian putsch and the civil war, while ignoring all the wars waged by the West from Yugoslavia to Iraq on up to Libya, Gauck alleged that Russia had “violated international law” and “annexed foreign territory.”[2] Alluding to Great Britain and France’s approbation of Germany’s occupation of parts of Czechoslovakia in October 1938, targeting Russia, Gauck declared, “history teaches us that territorial concessions often whet the appetite of the aggressors.” The commemoration of Nazi crimes was thereby transformed into an appeal to close ranks against Russia, which Germany had invaded.

A “Culture of Chagrin”

On various occasions before becoming president, Gauck, who, unlike Russia’s President Putin, will be present at Auschwitz January 27, had made public statements showing how he views Germany’s 1945 liberation and the Shoah [Holocaust]. In his memoirs, he wrote on the subject of Germany’s liberation, that it arrived as “horrible news.” He depicted the Red Army soldiers as beings “with Asian facial features,” reeking “of vodka,” who “requisitioned and stole” and systematically raped women.[3] In 2006, Gauck remorsefully claimed that there is “a tendency toward sanctifying the Holocaust,” wherein “the occurrence of German Judeocide is inflated to a uniqueness that ultimately escapes comprehension and analysis.” “Certain milieux of post-religious societies” were persistently searching “for the dimension of the absolute, a certain shudder in face of the unspeakable.” This could also be achieved by “the absolute evil” and is “paradoxically of psychological advantage.”[4] Gauck has stated several times that “the Germans” would be well advised to change their approach to history. In the fall of 2010, he mused, “I ask myself, how much longer do we Germans want to nurture our culture of chagrin.”[5] This was after he had positively responded to the question whether “the majority of the Germans” are mature enough for a “reorientation toward their own victims, the reorientation toward the patriotic.” “That’s how I see it.”[6]

Broad Brush

Until he was inaugurated president, Gauck’s historical views were criticized in German public opinion. For example, he has a knack for using the “broad brush,” in reference to his remarks on the “Black Book of Communism.”[7] Gauck had written that “the communists had also made themselves unpopular, when they … approved Poland’s westward acquisition of territory and thereby Germany’s loss of its eastern territories.” “To both the natives and the expellees, this loss of the homeland was considered a great injustice, which the communists sealed in 1950, by recognizing the Oder-Neisse as the new German-Polish border,”[8] alleges Gauck. In the conflict over the “Centre against Expulsions,” he took the side of the president at the time, Erika Steinbach, who was sharply criticized for her historical revisionist statements, particularly in Poland. Gauck is quoted on the German League of Expellees’ (BdV) website saying, Berlin is most certainly the best location for a “Centre against Expulsions.” It blends in, because Berlin is where “there are various ‘topographies of terror,’ the location of the Wannsee Conference and the Stasi Headquarters, the former seat of government of brown and red despots.”[9]

Yatsenyuk’s “Soviet Invasion”

Gauck’s Auschwitz speech and Putin’s disinvitation coincide with Berlin’s open cooperation with the fascist successors of Nazi collaborators to stage a pro-western coup in Kiev, (german-foreign-policy.com reported.[10]) The Kiev government has adopted their anti-Russian standpoints, which are also increasingly having an influence on the German debate where they dovetail with old anti-Russian sentiments. Arseniy Yatsenyuk recently caused a stir with his interview on German television. He literally alleged, “We all remember well the Soviet invasion of Ukraine and Germany.”[11] This statement has remained unchallenged.


1. Streit in Polen über Einladung Putins zu Auschwitz-Gedenken 2015. http://www.tt.com 09.05.2014.

2. Gedenkfeier zum deutschen Überfall auf Polen 1939. http://www.bundespraesident.de 01.09.2014.

3. Joachim Gauck: Winter im Sommer, Frühling im Herbst. München 2009. See Hans-Rüdiger Minow: Der Zug der Erinnerung, die Deutsche Bahn und der Kampf gegen das Vergessen.

4. Joachim Gauck: Welche Erinnerungen braucht Europa? http://www.robert-bosch-stiftung.de. See The Consensus President.

5. “Mutige Politiker ziehe ich vor.” http://www.sueddeutsche.de 30.09.2010.

6. Gauck: Erinnerung an Vertreibung leugnet nicht den Nazi-Terror. http://www.dradio.de 31.08.2006.

7. Daniela Dahn: Gespalten statt versöhnt. http://www.sueddeutsche.de 10.06.2010.

8. Stéphane Courtois et al.: Das Schwarzbuch des Kommunismus. Unterdrückung, Verbrechen und Terror. München 1998.

9. http://www.z-g-v.de.

10. See Vom Stigma befreit

11. http://www.facebook.com/tagesschau/posts/10152968920374407

(For the original Article see, “Liberation without the Liberators,” germanforeignpolicy.com, January 16, 2015. Slightly edited for style by TML.)

Return to top

Who Is Going to Auschwitz?

General-Lieutenant (two stars) Vasily Petrenko was in charge of 107th infantry division at the time of the liberation of Auschwitz. He remembers what he saw when Auschwitz was liberated, “There were seven and a half thousand people remaining alive on the day I came to Auschwitz. I saw no normal people. Nazis evacuated everyone who who could walk on January 18, so only disabled inmates were left. I saw children… what a terrible sight! Swollen abdomens, wandering eyes, hands waving uselessly in the air, thin legs, huge heads. Other parts of the body did not look real — they appeared to be sown on. The children never produced a sound as they were showing individual inmate identification numbers tattooed on their hands.”

People of different nationalities perished in great numbers. The death rate was estimated in dozens of millions. But the triumph of German Nazism happened to be short-lived. Those days are remembered as the most terrible events in European history.

Soviet Read Army liberates prisoners at Auschwitz, January 27, 1945.

The death camps covered Central and Eastern Europe like bubonic plague sores. Even according to official data of the German Ministry of the Interior, the fascist regime built 1,634 concentration camps. Besides there were many other structures created to find the final solution to the problem of “second rate” people or “lower races.” Located 70 km from Krakow, Auschwitz was the largest (around 40 square km) network of concentration and extermination camps built and operated by Nazi Germany during WWII. It consisted of Auschwitz I (the original camp), Auschwitz II-Birkenau (a combination concentration/extermination camp), Auschwitz III-Monowitz (the largest sub-camp of Auschwitz) and satellite camps. The first prisoners came there in June 1940. There were over 100,000 inmates as of 1944. The camp was the place of mass extermination of peoples, especially of the Jews. There were inmates from Poland, the USSR, Austria, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Greece, the Netherlands, Yugoslavia, Norway, Romania, Italy and Hungary. For a long time the number of victims was believed to be at least 1.1 million. In 2010, Russia’s Federal Security Service declassified the data which showed that more than four million inmates were killed by the Nazis.

There were four crematoriums and two provisional gas chambers. Soviet prisoners and weak inmates were the first to undergo the Zyklon B gas trials in the spring of 1942. At first bodies were buried, then eliminated in crematoria and ditches specially dug for the purpose. Inmates underwent medical experiments. The factory of death killed 150,000 inmates a month. Crematoria and fires burning all night eliminated 270,000 bodies monthly.

The Soviet Supreme Command knew about the existence of the death camps. It ordered the 1st and 4th Ukrainian fronts to liberate Auschwitz during the Vistula-Oder offensive operation. The 100th infantry division led by General Fyodor Krasavin took Auschwitz on January 27, 1945 to save the lives of the remaining 7,000 inmates. The reality was shocking. The machine of extermination was perfect and smooth-running. Here is some evidence provided to Smersh counterintelligence by imprisoned fascist perpetrators. Elizabeth Gazelow (superintendent in Ravensbrück, Majdanek and Auschwitz) says, “There were 40-45,000 inmates of different nationalities: Russian, Ukrainians, Poles, Czech, French. It was a camp of extermination. It had a crematorium, gas chambers … Children were put into the chambers in front of their parents.”

Willie Steinborn (SS-Rottenführer, a guard) remembers, “A large group of Poles, Russians and other nationalities was to be exterminated. The inmates offered resistance. SS guards let dogs attack them. They enjoyed the picture as live people separated from each other were torn and mangled by dogs.”

Alfred Skchipek (in charge of barrack N8), “There was a punishment called ‘steinbunker.’ Twenty to thirty people were put into a small cell. With such little space they could only stand there. No windows, there was only a few millimeters-wide crack in the wall. With no air coming in, inmates suffocated. Transported in winter to be exterminated, prisoners were made to work outside without shoes and clothes on until they died of cold. There were 200-300 victims at a time.”

Piles of bodies found at Auschwitz when the camp was liberated.

There were thousands of such testimonies that make one shudder. I’m afraid all this evidence is not enough to make a single tear drop from the eyes of those who today are mourning the dead, in Washington, London, Brussels and Warsaw. They say that this is the time to commemorate the victims of gas chambers, but in reality they take the side of the perpetrators, not the victims. In Europe and overseas they speak the right words to remember those who suffered from the Holocaust while turning a blind eye on the SS marches that regularly take place in the Baltic States for already 20 years. They nod their heads upon hearing the delirium about the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe and even Germany and say that the fascist coup in Kiev is nothing but the expression of the people’s will. They say that Moscow’s support for the compatriots shelled in the Donbass is an aggression. The egregious political intrigue and maneuvering mixed with stone age Russophobia makes the Western elite unable to discern the revival of the global evil which would have ruled the world today, if it had not been for the Soviet Union and its Red Army which demonstrated unparalleled prowess 70 years ago. This is conniving to give this evil the environment to make it thrive today.

Vladimir Putin can put up with the fact that he is not invited to the major event at Auschwitz marking 70 years since inmates of the Nazi death camp were liberated by the Red Army. No great pleasure to meet the sycophants who gather millions to take part in the Paris march to protest the death of journalists-provocateurs and watch indifferently as the Khatyn massacre is repeated in Odessa. They have the chutzpah to say they don’t want to see in Auschwitz the head of state who ordered the attack against Ukraine. The sponsors of Ukraine’s neo-Nazi regime believe it’s not expedient to invite the head of state claiming to be the successor of the Soviet Union — the country that liberated Auschwitz and half of Europe. But they find it expedient to invite the Chancellor of Germany who supports the Nazi regime in Ukraine to prove that it’s too early to affirm that Germans have successfully gone through denazification. They find Nazism unacceptable on their soil but put up with its presence in other countries…

The organizers want to commemorate the victims of Auschwitz standing side by side with the leaders of Ukraine’s fascist regime. Could it be any other way? All those kapos (a prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp assigned by the SS guards to supervise other inmates) and “block-eltesters” (the eldest man of the block in a concentration camp) — the Banderites and their successors — are spiritual mentors of such gentlemen as Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Secretary of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine Oleksandr Turchynov and leader of the far-right Right Sector Dmytro Yarosh. Just ask them and they will willingly tell you a story about how they defended civilized Europe from the hordes coming from the East. They will also tell you how to operate the furnaces of Auschwitz, use people as guinea pigs for experiments with Zyklon B and torture unarmed inmates. Especially in view that the experience is remembered as Ukraine conducting a so-called anti-terror operation in the east.

The participation in the events of Western leaders who head the states that were the USSR’s allies during WWII is a special case for consideration. The words they say about democratic standards on the territory of Auschwitz sound like talk about rope in the house of a man who has been hanged. Especially if one remembers how their predecessors — Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill — reacted to the information about what happened in Nazi concentrations camps.

British doctoral student Barbara Rogers has discovered a 20-page document in the Foreign Office archive proving conclusively that Britain and the United States knew about the gas chambers at Auschwitz as early as December 1942. The information was contained in a memorandum passed to the British government and handed to U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt by Jewish leaders at a White House meeting on Dec. 8, 1942.

While it has been known that the Allies knew then about the “Final Solution” — and even about gas chambers — this is the first time it was demonstrated that the Allies knew in 1942 about the crematoria at Auschwitz. The document informed Roosevelt that “centers have been established in various parts of Eastern Europe for the scientific and cold-blooded mass murder of Jews. Polish Christian workers, eyewitnesses, have confirmed reports that concrete buildings, on the former Russian frontiers, are used by the Germans as gas chambers in which thousands of Jews have been put to death.”

The memorandum also specifically informed Roosevelt: “The slaughter of trainloads of Jewish adults and children in great crematoriums at Ozwiencim [Auschwitz] near Krakow is confirmed by eyewitnesses in reports which recently reached Jerusalem.” There is no information the allies ever reacted. The find reignites debates about why the Allies took no action, such as bombing, to disrupt the operation of Auschwitz. The researcher made precise the reasons why London did not contact Berlin on the matter. The British feared a flood of Jewish emigration from Europe to Palestine (Palestine was then part of the British Empire). The other reason is that they were anxious to avoid a popular backlash if they were perceived to be fighting a “Jewish war.”

In other words, whole nations were sacrificed in the interests of the British Empire. Even after the Second Front was open and Anglo-American forces moved to the east and their aviation could easily reach Auschwitz nothing was done to at least interrupt transport routes to the camp and thus complicate the continuation of heinous crimes committed by Germans. No wonder the contemporary successors of Roosevelt and Churchill are prone to hypocrisy. Meeting in Washington on January 16, Barack Obama and David Cameron agreed to keep sanctions on Russia until it stops its “aggression” in Ukraine. “We agree on the need to maintain strong sanctions against Russia until it ends its aggression in Ukraine, and on the need to support Ukraine as it implements important economic and democratic reforms,” Obama said after talks in Washington with the UK Prime Minister. What a striking similarity: some believe that crematoria and gas chambers serve as instruments of purification while others use napalm and multiple launch rocket systems against civilians in the Donbass as the means of implementing “democratic reforms.” Don’t be surprised, ladies and gentlemen, if the fires of new crematorium will be smelled again in Europe.

Those forces seeking to isolate Russia actively support neo-Nazi and fascist organizations in Ukraine today. These organizations are committing various crimes, such as the May 2, 2014 massacre in Odessa, when Ukrainian fascists attacked a group of people near the Ukrainian Trade Union building, forcing some inside and setting the building on fire. Dozens were killed and many more injured. (Stop NATO)

(Strategic Culture, January 20, 2015. Slightly edited for style by TML.)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s